Select Page

Social Media CEO’s Ordered to Testify

social media ceo ordered to testifySo more about the last post about Facebook and Twitter. Now the CEO’s of these companies are being ordered to testify. I guess blocking whatever the hell they want has turned on them. Now they have to explain why they are assholes. They want to be the “keepers of free speech” but they are dictators of what you should and shouldn’t know.

I Wonder if…

They are going to bring their “independent fact-checkers” with them to testify. That would be great to identify who these smucks are in the first place. At the moment I”m convinced that it’s simply their way of blocking whatever they want. And fact-checkers are hired freelancers who write the same stories as those you see in the “30 celebrity’s without makeup” articles. Or the “celebrity pictures now and then, are they still beautiful?” 

You know the stories I’m talking about you clicked on those out of boredom and you have to be very cautious not to click on the ad that will take you somewhere else. They always show ONE picture at a time and  you have to find the “next” button that really is the “NEXT” not just an ad that looks like you have to click it to go forward.

Validity of the Story Confirmed By Biden’s Ex-Business Partner


biden ex business partnerThe story blocked by social media has proven to be more valid then Facebook or Twitter want you to believe.


Now Biden’s ex-business partner has come out to acknowledge the e-mails (since you know he is one of the recipients in them). How much more verification do you need to understand this is a problem then a dude who’s addressed IN the e-mail to say YES it really happened?


Damn media wants you to believe it’s still an “unverified” story and that there’s no weight behind it. Somehow it just magically appeared. Oh by the way this laptop was confiscated by the FBI in 2019 for an investigation of money laundering through China. Oh didn’t know that either did you?




Now we have all seen how this past administration handles snitches right? That’s right the ‘ole “snitches get dead” yup not even stitches, you just somehow get put on suicide watch and magically die. Speaking of which, why is it that seemingly everyone from the past administration is pushing so hard for “No-Go Joe” Biden for president?


I don’t know, but my guess with all this information coming to light is that they don’t want everyone to see how they were a part of it. I have never seen a presidential election where one candidate is backed so heavy by previous administration folks. 

NOPE, usually those previous dudes retire and say fuck this shit I’m done! There is nowhere to go after president that’s the top guy. Everyone else gets done with their 4-8 year stint and go into hiding (retirement) rarely to be seen but here and there. Sound familiar there non-combat pogues? 


Blast from the past:


Now he’s in “protective custody”. It happened pretty much immediately. What they go into on a few of these articles is that he was in a “minimum secu

rity white-collar crime prison.” He goes in to do some time then that’s it. He was ready to get released in a few months now. SO why put him into solitary? 

Solitary Confinement

protective custody tweet


Is just what it says, solitary. They put you in a room by yourself away fromall witnesses (I mean other criminals and prison guards) and you stay there. Seems to me like it’s two fold


  1. They want him disappeared and unavaliable for questions on this issue
  2. It’s much easier to make someone disappear or go mute when there’s no witnesses. Just sayin…

Whitehouse release of 60 Minutes Interview

The only way to summarize this is by a definition of a term that all of this comes down to…

Passive Aggressive

60 Minutes OutrageThe media wants outrage for the whitehouse releasing this too early? However, it seems to me from reading the articles they are more pissed that they it’s not “edited” and go on to say that “she didn’t say anything wrong or to provoke the president he’s overreacting.” That’s bullshit people, it’s called passive aggressive! It’s where you slam someone by the way you treat them yet you still use words that can enable you to claim you are innocent from any wrongdoing. I can’t beleive people fall for this shit!

webster definition of passive aggressive


White House’s Copy of the 60 Minute Interview

Just in case Facebook and Twitter decide to take this down I’ve saved a copy for all of you to view at your leasure. Also you now have a comparison against the edited version from 60 Minutes that supposively aired yesterday. I was too busy having fun with family to waste time watching that crap.

I guess since the week has started I should go back and view the edited version and compare myself.